Video Details
|
Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2
Description:
Missing soft tissue is the main reason for compromised results in the aesthetic zone. But since the soft tissue has to be supported by a sufficient amount of bone, our focus has also to be on bone. Due to the fact that no bone-preservation technique (at the time of tooth extraction) available today, gives us the perfect result we need, augmentation procedures are still needed.
Appropriate bone and soft tissue engineering in all three dimensions enhances the aesthetic performance of long-lasting restorations that blend in well and emerge from the periimplant sulcus in harmony with the neighboring teeth.
Date Added:
8/26/2019
Author(s):
Ueli Grunder, DMD
Dr. Ueli Grunder received his DMD degree from the University of Zurich, Switzerland, in 1982. His post-graduate education in advanced fixed prosthodontics als...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2
Questions & Comments
|
Mohamed Ahmed216 - (9/4/2019 11:07 PM)
can you please let us know the exact type and brand of adhesive you use for free gingival graft and also the harvesting tool for it as well.
It was a great lecture, I love it.
thank you
|
VISHAL SINGH - (9/4/2019 1:37 AM)
Dr Gründer,thank you for great insights. i have a question..Have you come across of xenografts especially bio-sos getting incorporated into overlying soft tissue after GBR procedure and fibrosis of tissues around the graft?.
As i have observed in my cases at second stage surgery. that fibrotic tissues really tough to mobilise.
Need your opinion on this and is it normal phenomenon or just few rare encounters ?
Your insights are highly invaluable. Thank You
|
James Vu - (4/30/2019 1:23 PM)
This is amazing! I watched both lectures and I have learned so much. PREDICTABILITY proven by skill and time. Thank you.
|
Eric Pena - (9/3/2018 12:05 AM)
Thank you very much for sharing your clinical experience to us !!!! I had learned so much from it.
|
Maurice Salama - (8/20/2018 5:15 PM)
If there is any better or more proficient clinician and educator please send him our way. This was like drinking from a great fountain of knowledge and experience. A must for ANYONE performing implants in the esthetic zone!! Dr. Salama
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 1 of 2
Missing soft tissue is the main reason for compromised results in the aesthetic zone. But since the soft tissue has to be supported by a sufficient amount of bone, our focus has also to be on bone. Due to the fact that no bone-preservation technique (at the time of tooth extraction) available today, gives us the perfect result we need, augmentation procedures are still needed.
Appropriate bone and soft tissue engineering in all three dimensions enhances the aesthetic performance of long-lasting restorations that blend in well and emerge from the periimplant sulcus in harmony with the neighboring teeth.
Presented By:: |
Ueli Grunder, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraction Site Management
The biological rational for making clinical decisions relative to the requirement for grafting or the benefits of flapless implant protocols.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2
Missing soft tissue is the main reason for compromised results in the aesthetic zone. But since the soft tissue has to be supported by a sufficient amount of bone, our focus has also to be on bone. Due to the fact that no bone-preservation technique (at the time of tooth extraction) available today, gives us the perfect result we need, augmentation procedures are still needed. Appropriate bone and soft tissue engineering in all three dimensions enhances the aesthetic performance of long-lasting restorations that blend in well and emerge from the periimplant sulcus in harmony with the neighboring teeth.
Presented By:: |
Ueli Grunder, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Partners in Synergy - The Webinar Event; Augmentation Strategies in Implant Dentistry
This course will highlight the current available regenerative techniques and protocols to maximize the esthetic results of tooth replacement therapy. Extraction site management, labial bone enhancement as well as current gingival augmentation techniques will be featured. These highly acclaimed clinicians and educators will team up to provide a glimpse of their upcoming LIVE Synergy VI conference June 11th - 14th, 2015 in Orlando, Florida.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD;Michael A Pikos, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Esthetic Tissue Reconstruction Around Implants - Part 2 of 2
Esthetics in implant-supported restorations is an important clinical objective in contemporary dentistry. Understanding the biological behavior of hard and soft tissues following tooth extraction is the first step to anticipate the physiological tissue remodeling and its consequences. Our objective in these 2 sequencial lectures was to provide straightforward decision trees related to several clinical scenarios observed in routine clinical practice. The 3 fundamental pillars for peri-implant excellence are: restorative-driven implant position, hard and soft tissue reconstruction using different biomaterials and grafts, and prosthetic management. Using this philosophical approach seems to provide esthetic and stable results over time irrespective of the initial clinical condition.
Presented By:: |
Robert Carvalho da Silva, DDS, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate Implants: Partial / Full Arch Rehabilitation & GBR - Part 2
By scientific studies produced in recent years has been confirmed, in selected cases, the validity of the post-extraction implants. The use of this method implies a lower emotional impact, a single surgery and a healing often better for the patient. We will be discussed traumatic extraction methods, perfect insertion of the implants with or without bone regeneration with bone substitutes and membranes and the opportunity to combine an advanced method as immediate implant with the execution of an immediate loading to restore aesthetics in more complex cases.
Presented By:: |
Alfonso Coscarella, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Use of Bone Grafts for the Enhancement of a GTR-Based Root Coverage Procedure: A Pilot Case Study
The use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedures for the treatment of gingival recession has shown encouraging results and is gaining clinical acceptance. However, attaining space maintenance beneath the membrane remains a problem for clinicians. Hence, the purpose of this pilot case study was to evaluate the effect of adjunctive demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) placement during collagen membrane GTR-based root coverage procedures. Five patients with Miller Class I or II defects…
Author(s): |
Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD;Kenneth Kimble, DDS, MS, Robert Eber, DDS, MS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
Subclassification and Clinical Management of Extraction Sockets with Labial Dentoalveolar Dehiscence Defects
Immediate implant therapy involving implants placed into intact Type 1 extraction sockets has become a consistent clinical technique. The classification of Type 2 extraction sockets, where the mucosal tissues are present but there is a midfacial osseous dehiscence defect, has been described according to the extent of the buccal bone plate absence. The literature has offered different techniques in the treatment of Type 2 sockets; however, the extent of the defect has never been defined or delineated.
Author(s): |
Stephen J. Chu, DMD, MSD, CDT;Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS;Guido O. Sarnachiaro, DDS; Mark N. Hochman, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
|