Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site

Description:
In this surgical technique video, Dr. Michael Sonick shares a routine clinical challenge and demonstrates the extraction of a fractured premolar with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. His very detailed and concise demonstration focuses on the preparation of the extraction site as well as the utilization of growth factors and membranes.

Date Added:
9/24/2010

Author(s):

Michael Sonick, DMD Michael Sonick, DMD
Dr. Michael Sonick is a full time practicing periodontist and implant surgeon in Fairfield, Connecticut. He is also an active teacher, clinical researcher and author. ...
[read more]


Featured Products


Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site




Questions & Comments
Joon Kim554 - (10/7/2017 9:33 AM)

Do you use surgical handpiece with the brassler bur 7408028? Is this a carbide bur that people often use for their composite?

Joon Kim554 - (10/7/2017 9:31 AM)

I wouldn't cover the top part of the socket with the membrane you used on covering the buccal. All resorbable membranes (even the long lasting ones), resorb too early when exposed to saliva enzyme. These membranes are supposed to be used for primary closure but we need secondary closure to achieve keratinized tissue. Ideal way to do it is do exactly what you did but also cover the top part with PTFE non resorbable membrane.

alireza torabi - (8/10/2013 9:06 PM)

Good job!

Mike Sonick - (4/20/2013 11:19 AM)

George. Thanks for your question. Please see my answer below to Benjamin. I agree with the publication by Artzi. That is why I use cancellous allograft with a growth factor. I obtain 50% vital bone in 6 months.

Mike Sonick - (4/20/2013 11:17 AM)

Benjamin There is not way to know if there is vital bone without a biopsy. In my experience the use of BioOss and Biogide results in 50% vital bone in approximately 6-9 months. The turnover is slow. I usually use Puros or some other bone allograft with Gem 21 and a collagen membrane. I have been able to obtain 50% vital bone in 4 months with this technique. For more information you may want to consult my text Implant Site Development published by Wiley Blackwell

Benjamin Saidel - (2/21/2013 8:36 PM)

Dr Sonick I am a quite new with these bone grafting techniques so your assistance will be greatly appreciated I grafted a socket following the extraction of a upper left first molar last year which had fractured post endo. (There was periapical pathology extending into the furcation with an associated buccal swelling.) Following extraction of the tooth it became obvious that the buccal plate had been lost so I raised a flap and grafted the socket using only Bio-OSS and a Bio-guide membrane. The socket healed uneventfully ( some granules had leaked out from under the membrane at 1 week review but did not seem to adversely affect healing) This was 6- 8 months ago. I have reviewed her a couple of times during this period and clinically the tissues have healed well. I have also taken peri apical X-rays which show the graft material  The patient is now ready to have the implant placed. I have taken a CBCT and in the area of the socket is a dense radiopacity which must be the graft material. My question to you is the following- Has bone formed in this area or is it only graft material? I am now concerned that when I raise a flap to place the implant all I will find is graft material with little or no new bone,which may even come away in the flap and I will be left with an open socket or partially healed socket Kind regards Benjamin Saidel London

George Kotsakis - (4/24/2011 11:19 AM)

Dr Sonick, you have been fastiduous in explaining us every step as always, thank you very much. I have only one question, you seem to have used some bovine graft as well. I have in my mind the publication by Artzi et al on bovine xenografts, where after 6 months the had minimal mature bone, mostly CT on the coronal aspect of the socket and almost 35% of xenograft all over the socket. Howcome u manage to get back in, as early as 5 months and get dense bone???

Mike Sonick - (12/12/2010 6:12 PM)

Jorge
The membrane was not exposed. It was placed underneath the tissue and a collagen plug placed coronally. altho the collagen plug is left exposed this does not seem to be a problem for it is completely epithelialized within two weeks. I used to use CTG for this procedure but have found them to take more time with no improvement in result.

Immediate implants without a flap with this technique would be a probelm for the buccal plate would not be regenerated. It is all about eh buccal plate. If no buccal plate exists you must flap and regenerate independent of whether you are placing an implant or not.

Jorge Gutierrez - (11/29/2010 9:42 AM)

Dr Michael I would like to know in your video the membrane was exposed to the mouth that does not compromise the final result of their work, would not be better to cover with tissue graft?
What do you think of making an immediate implants with the technique without flap?

Related Videos
Managing the Extraction Site - Optimal Preservation and Enhancement Techniques Premium Member Content

Managing the Extraction Site - Optimal Preservation and Enhancement Techniques
The importance of piezosurgery, atraumatic surgical technique, the use of bone grafts, resorbable membranes and growth factors will be elucidated along with soft tissue enhancement.

Presented By:: Michael Sonick, DMD
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Flap Management and Site Preparation in Anterior Bone Augmentation - Part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Flap Management and Site Preparation in Anterior Bone Augmentation - Part 1 of 2
Dr. Howard Gluckman outlines his decision making on incision design and flap management in preparation for anterior osseous augmentation in conjunction with implant placement.

Presented By:: Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Bone Preservation at Extraction Site Premium Member Content

Bone Preservation at Extraction Site
This presentation will show the decision tree of how to merge different extraction sockets.

Presented By:: Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD;Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Surgical Management of Posterior Maxilla Premium Member Content

Surgical Management of Posterior Maxilla
Replacement of missing teeth with dental Implants in the posterior maxilla presents unique challenges due to maxillary sinus, less quality of bone, and increased occlusal load. The surgical objectives to meet functional and aesthetic goals include enhancement of both quantity and quality of bone as well as ideal placement of dental implants for restorations that mimic nature. In this presentation, Dr. H. Ryan Kazemi discusses current surgical techniques in implant site development in the posterior maxilla including extraction site grafting, sinus lift, bi-directional bone graft, and osseodensification for bone management.

Presented By:: H. Ryan Kazemi, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Watch Now>>
Bone Augmentation & Vascular Enhancement Concepts: It’s Time to Make it Simple! Premium Member Content

Bone Augmentation & Vascular Enhancement Concepts: It’s Time to Make it Simple!
The purpose of this presentation is to make the participant think biology first and not mechanic first. A biological thinking will dramatically simplify vertical and/or horizontal bone augmentation procedures. We will also be introducing a new approach for the simplification of soft tissue handling: the Soft Brushing Technique, that will allow the coronal advancement of both buccal and lingual flaps, but also the palatal flap without the need for periosteal releasing incisions.

Presented By:: Jérôme Surmenian, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Watch Now>>
Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2 Premium Member Content

Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2
Missing soft tissue is the main reason for compromised results in the aesthetic zone. But since the soft tissue has to be supported by a sufficient amount of bone, our focus has also to be on bone. Due to the fact that no bone-preservation technique (at the time of tooth extraction) available today, gives us the perfect result we need, augmentation procedures are still needed. Appropriate bone and soft tissue engineering in all three dimensions enhances the aesthetic performance of long-lasting restorations that blend in well and emerge from the periimplant sulcus in harmony with the neighboring teeth.

Presented By:: Ueli Grunder, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Procedure (Tunneling Technique) Using rhPDGF-BB in Combination with Three Matrices: A Case Series

Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Procedure (Tunneling Technique) Using rhPDGF-BB in Combination with Three Matrices: A Case Series
This study investigated a minimally invasive surgical procedure for alveolar ridge augmentation that combined recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF-BB) and three different matrices.

Author(s): Myron Nevins, DDS;Marc L. Nevins, DMD, MMSc; Marcelo Camelo, DDS; Peter Schupbach, PhD; Bernard Friedland, BChD, MSc, JD; Joao Marcelo Borges Camelo, DDS; David M. Kim, DDS, DMSc
View Article>>
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Titanium Membrane at Implant Placement: A Case Report and Literature Discussion

Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Titanium Membrane at Implant Placement: A Case Report and Literature Discussion
Reconstruction of the oral supporting tissues lost by disease or trauma is essential to tooth replacement with dental implant therapy. This treatment requires evidence based augmentative procedures combined with up-to-date and current techniques. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) aims to initialize this process of alveolar ridge reconstruction by utilizing biologically active and supportive materials best coupled to the body’s healing processes. The use of nonresorbable, titanium membranes can achieve GBR by ensuring graft stability and space maintenance so as to ensure optimal neovascularization. Hereafter is a case report of a ridge defect reconstructed at implant placement, with the rationale and current, evidence-based literature discussed.

Author(s): Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD;Jonathan Du Toit
View Article>>
Influence of Thin Mucosal Tissues on Crestal Bone Stability Around Implants With Platform Switching: A 1-year Pilot Study

Influence of Thin Mucosal Tissues on Crestal Bone Stability Around Implants With Platform Switching: A 1-year Pilot Study
The aim of this pilot study was to determine what effect thin mucosal tissues can have on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching. Within the limitations of this pilot study it can be concluded that implants with platform switching did not preserve crestal bone better in comparison with implants with traditional implant-abutment connection if, at the time of implant placement, thin mucosal tissues were present.

Author(s): Tomas Linkevicius, DDS, Dip Pros, PhD;Peteris Apse, Prof, DDS, Dip Pros, MSc (Toronto); Dr hab Med (Latvia); Simonas Grybauskas, DDS, MOS, RCSEd, PhD; Algirdas Puisys, DDS
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2019

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login ·