Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site

Description:
In this surgical technique video, Dr. Michael Sonick shares a routine clinical challenge and demonstrates the extraction of a fractured premolar with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. His very detailed and concise demonstration focuses on the preparation of the extraction site as well as the utilization of growth factors and membranes.

Date Added:
9/24/2010

Author(s):

Michael Sonick, DMD Michael Sonick, DMD
Dr. Michael Sonick is a full time practicing periodontist and implant surgeon in Fairfield, Connecticut. He is also an active teacher, clinical researcher and author. ...
[read more]


Featured Products




Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site




Questions & Comments
Joon Kim554 - (10/7/2017 9:33 AM)

Do you use surgical handpiece with the brassler bur 7408028? Is this a carbide bur that people often use for their composite?

Joon Kim554 - (10/7/2017 9:31 AM)

I wouldn't cover the top part of the socket with the membrane you used on covering the buccal. All resorbable membranes (even the long lasting ones), resorb too early when exposed to saliva enzyme. These membranes are supposed to be used for primary closure but we need secondary closure to achieve keratinized tissue. Ideal way to do it is do exactly what you did but also cover the top part with PTFE non resorbable membrane.

alireza torabi - (8/10/2013 9:06 PM)

Good job!

Mike Sonick - (4/20/2013 11:19 AM)

George. Thanks for your question. Please see my answer below to Benjamin. I agree with the publication by Artzi. That is why I use cancellous allograft with a growth factor. I obtain 50% vital bone in 6 months.

Mike Sonick - (4/20/2013 11:17 AM)

Benjamin There is not way to know if there is vital bone without a biopsy. In my experience the use of BioOss and Biogide results in 50% vital bone in approximately 6-9 months. The turnover is slow. I usually use Puros or some other bone allograft with Gem 21 and a collagen membrane. I have been able to obtain 50% vital bone in 4 months with this technique. For more information you may want to consult my text Implant Site Development published by Wiley Blackwell

Benjamin Saidel - (2/21/2013 8:36 PM)

Dr Sonick I am a quite new with these bone grafting techniques so your assistance will be greatly appreciated I grafted a socket following the extraction of a upper left first molar last year which had fractured post endo. (There was periapical pathology extending into the furcation with an associated buccal swelling.) Following extraction of the tooth it became obvious that the buccal plate had been lost so I raised a flap and grafted the socket using only Bio-OSS and a Bio-guide membrane. The socket healed uneventfully ( some granules had leaked out from under the membrane at 1 week review but did not seem to adversely affect healing) This was 6- 8 months ago. I have reviewed her a couple of times during this period and clinically the tissues have healed well. I have also taken peri apical X-rays which show the graft material  The patient is now ready to have the implant placed. I have taken a CBCT and in the area of the socket is a dense radiopacity which must be the graft material. My question to you is the following- Has bone formed in this area or is it only graft material? I am now concerned that when I raise a flap to place the implant all I will find is graft material with little or no new bone,which may even come away in the flap and I will be left with an open socket or partially healed socket Kind regards Benjamin Saidel London

George Kotsakis - (4/24/2011 11:19 AM)

Dr Sonick, you have been fastiduous in explaining us every step as always, thank you very much. I have only one question, you seem to have used some bovine graft as well. I have in my mind the publication by Artzi et al on bovine xenografts, where after 6 months the had minimal mature bone, mostly CT on the coronal aspect of the socket and almost 35% of xenograft all over the socket. Howcome u manage to get back in, as early as 5 months and get dense bone???

Mike Sonick - (12/12/2010 6:12 PM)

Jorge
The membrane was not exposed. It was placed underneath the tissue and a collagen plug placed coronally. altho the collagen plug is left exposed this does not seem to be a problem for it is completely epithelialized within two weeks. I used to use CTG for this procedure but have found them to take more time with no improvement in result.

Immediate implants without a flap with this technique would be a probelm for the buccal plate would not be regenerated. It is all about eh buccal plate. If no buccal plate exists you must flap and regenerate independent of whether you are placing an implant or not.

Jorge Gutierrez - (11/29/2010 9:42 AM)

Dr Michael I would like to know in your video the membrane was exposed to the mouth that does not compromise the final result of their work, would not be better to cover with tissue graft?
What do you think of making an immediate implants with the technique without flap?

Related Videos
Bone Preservation at Extraction Site Premium Member Content

Bone Preservation at Extraction Site
This presentation will show the decision tree of how to merge different extraction sockets.

Presented By:: Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD;Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Titanium Mesh GBR at the Time of Implant Placement in the Anterior Region part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Titanium Mesh GBR at the Time of Implant Placement in the Anterior Region part 1 of 2
This video details the management of a Titanium Mesh supported GBR procedure in the replacement of a Maxillary Central Incisor.

Presented By:: Tomohiro Ishikawa, DDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmentation - Biologic Rationale, Surgical Technique & Long-Term Results Premium Member Content

Early Implant Placement with Contour Augmentation - Biologic Rationale, Surgical Technique & Long-Term Results
Today, the timing of implant placement post-extraction in the esthetic zone is considered an important factor which influences the esthetic treatment outcome. One of these options is early implant placement after 4 to 8 weeks of soft-tissue healing. The purpose of this presentation is to present data and to analyze the stability of esthetic treatment outcomes in patients following single-tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla using the concept of early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation. Special emphasis will be placed on assessing the stability of the facial mucosa, since it directly depends on the stability of successful contour augmentation by GBR and to compare it to currently utilized immediate techniques like Dual Zone Therapy (Chu & Tarnow) and Partial Extraction Therapies (Salama & Gluckman).

Presented By:: Prof. Dr. Urs C. Belser;Daniel Buser, DDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Microsurgical Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Teeth & Implants - Part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Microsurgical Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Teeth & Implants - Part 1 of 2
This presentation is focused in the importance of soft tissue grafting techniques around teeth and implants and how to do it in a predictable, modern and a minimally invasive way. We present many different techniques illustrated with clinical cases.

Presented By:: Ramon Gomez Meda, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2 Premium Member Content

Esthetic Management for Compromised Extraction Sites - Part 2 of 2
Missing soft tissue is the main reason for compromised results in the aesthetic zone. But since the soft tissue has to be supported by a sufficient amount of bone, our focus has also to be on bone. Due to the fact that no bone-preservation technique (at the time of tooth extraction) available today, gives us the perfect result we need, augmentation procedures are still needed. Appropriate bone and soft tissue engineering in all three dimensions enhances the aesthetic performance of long-lasting restorations that blend in well and emerge from the periimplant sulcus in harmony with the neighboring teeth.

Presented By:: Ueli Grunder, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Modern Implant Dentistry: Rules of Engagement in the Esthetic Zone - Part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Modern Implant Dentistry: Rules of Engagement in the Esthetic Zone - Part 1 of 2
This presentation will focus on the interdisciplinary relationship of the restorative dentist, periodontist and orthodontist to reconstruct the soft tissue foundation for all of these restorative options in anterior tooth replacement. The diagnosis of deficiencies as well as the varied treatment options will be discussed in detail. This includes periodontal crown lengthening, esthetic periodontal plastic soft tissue grafting procedures as well as prescription adjunctive orthodontic tooth movement to manipulate the soft tissue foundation prior to or subsequent with the restorative options of implants, bridges, or pontic replacement.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD;David Garber, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
Reconstruction of Damaged Fresh Sockets by Connective-Bone Sliver Graft From the Maxillary Tuberosity, to Enable Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration - A Clinical Case

Reconstruction of Damaged Fresh Sockets by Connective-Bone Sliver Graft From the Maxillary Tuberosity, to Enable Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration - A Clinical Case
This paper describes a procedure for immediate loading of an implant following tooth extraction, in a socket presenting severe damage to the vestibular bone plate and gingival recession in the region of the upper central incisors. The procedures of extraction of the tooth, immediate insertion of the implant, connective- bone graft from the maxillary tuberosity and immediate restoration were shown to be a predictable treatment alternative. These procedures led to restoration of the tooth, bone and gingival structures in a single surgical stage and to maintenance of the favorable esthetic and functional result 24 months afterwards.

Author(s): José Carlos Martins da Rosa, DDS, MS;Darcymar Martins da Rosa; Carla Mônica Zardo; Ariádene Cristina Pértile de Oliveira Rosa; Luigi Canullo
View Article>>
Long Term Follow-Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft

Long Term Follow-Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of autologous intraoral onlay bone grafting (OBG) in correlation with long-term survival rates of dental implants placed in the augmented bone. A retrospective study was conducted on 214 patients who received a total of 633 dental implants placed in 224 autologous intraoral block OBG augmentations, combined with Bio-Oss – mixed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and covered by platelet-poor plasma (PPP) – as scaffold, with a follow-up time up to 137 months. We suggest that augmentation of severely atrophied jaw bone through the placement of horizontal and/or vertical intraoral OBGs in combination with Bio-Oss saturated with PRP and covered by PPP should be considered a reliable, safe, and very effective surgical technique for obtaining high bone graft survival rate and high long-term implant survival rate.

Author(s): Devorah Schwartz-Arad, DMD, PhD;Ronen Ofec, DMD, MSc; Galit Eliyahu, PhD; Angela Ruban, PhD; Nir Sterer, DMD, PhD
View Article>>
Immediate Implant Placement into Extraction Sockets with Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects: A Clinical Case Series

Immediate Implant Placement into Extraction Sockets with Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects: A Clinical Case Series
To measure the buccal plate reconstruction of extraction sockets with labial plate dehiscence defects using a bone allograft in combination with an absorbable collagen membrane and a custom-healing abutment at the time of tooth removal. Implants placed into sockets with labial plate dehiscence defects demonstrated radiographic reformation of the labial plate dehiscence defect at 6 to 9 months post-treatment. The net gain in labial plate on CBCT in L1 and L2 was 3.0 mm, where 0 mm existed at pre-treatment. The minimum amount of labial plate thickness of 2.0 mm was achieved in all treated sites, evaluated radiographically at 6-9 months post-operatively, in a single procedure, without flap elevation and maintaining the gingival architecture and satisfactory esthetics.

Author(s): Stephen J. Chu, DMD, MSD, CDT;Dennis P. Tarnow, DDS;Guido O. Sarnachiaro, DDS; Evangelina Sarnachiaro, DDS; Sergio Luis Gotta, DDS
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2019

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login ·