Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site

Description:
In this surgical technique video, Dr. Michael Sonick shares a routine clinical challenge and demonstrates the extraction of a fractured premolar with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. His very detailed and concise demonstration focuses on the preparation of the extraction site as well as the utilization of growth factors and membranes.

Date Added:
9/24/2010

Author(s):

Michael Sonick, DMD Michael Sonick, DMD
Dr. Michael Sonick is a full time practicing periodontist and implant surgeon in Fairfield, Connecticut. He is also an active teacher, clinical researcher and author. ...
[read more]


Featured Products


Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Guided Bone Regeneration of a Compromised Extraction Site




Questions & Comments
Joon Kim554 - (10/7/2017 9:33 AM)

Do you use surgical handpiece with the brassler bur 7408028? Is this a carbide bur that people often use for their composite?

Joon Kim554 - (10/7/2017 9:31 AM)

I wouldn't cover the top part of the socket with the membrane you used on covering the buccal. All resorbable membranes (even the long lasting ones), resorb too early when exposed to saliva enzyme. These membranes are supposed to be used for primary closure but we need secondary closure to achieve keratinized tissue. Ideal way to do it is do exactly what you did but also cover the top part with PTFE non resorbable membrane.

alireza torabi - (8/10/2013 9:06 PM)

Good job!

Mike Sonick - (4/20/2013 11:19 AM)

George. Thanks for your question. Please see my answer below to Benjamin. I agree with the publication by Artzi. That is why I use cancellous allograft with a growth factor. I obtain 50% vital bone in 6 months.

Mike Sonick - (4/20/2013 11:17 AM)

Benjamin There is not way to know if there is vital bone without a biopsy. In my experience the use of BioOss and Biogide results in 50% vital bone in approximately 6-9 months. The turnover is slow. I usually use Puros or some other bone allograft with Gem 21 and a collagen membrane. I have been able to obtain 50% vital bone in 4 months with this technique. For more information you may want to consult my text Implant Site Development published by Wiley Blackwell

Benjamin Saidel - (2/21/2013 8:36 PM)

Dr Sonick I am a quite new with these bone grafting techniques so your assistance will be greatly appreciated I grafted a socket following the extraction of a upper left first molar last year which had fractured post endo. (There was periapical pathology extending into the furcation with an associated buccal swelling.) Following extraction of the tooth it became obvious that the buccal plate had been lost so I raised a flap and grafted the socket using only Bio-OSS and a Bio-guide membrane. The socket healed uneventfully ( some granules had leaked out from under the membrane at 1 week review but did not seem to adversely affect healing) This was 6- 8 months ago. I have reviewed her a couple of times during this period and clinically the tissues have healed well. I have also taken peri apical X-rays which show the graft material  The patient is now ready to have the implant placed. I have taken a CBCT and in the area of the socket is a dense radiopacity which must be the graft material. My question to you is the following- Has bone formed in this area or is it only graft material? I am now concerned that when I raise a flap to place the implant all I will find is graft material with little or no new bone,which may even come away in the flap and I will be left with an open socket or partially healed socket Kind regards Benjamin Saidel London

George Kotsakis - (4/24/2011 11:19 AM)

Dr Sonick, you have been fastiduous in explaining us every step as always, thank you very much. I have only one question, you seem to have used some bovine graft as well. I have in my mind the publication by Artzi et al on bovine xenografts, where after 6 months the had minimal mature bone, mostly CT on the coronal aspect of the socket and almost 35% of xenograft all over the socket. Howcome u manage to get back in, as early as 5 months and get dense bone???

Mike Sonick - (12/12/2010 6:12 PM)

Jorge
The membrane was not exposed. It was placed underneath the tissue and a collagen plug placed coronally. altho the collagen plug is left exposed this does not seem to be a problem for it is completely epithelialized within two weeks. I used to use CTG for this procedure but have found them to take more time with no improvement in result.

Immediate implants without a flap with this technique would be a probelm for the buccal plate would not be regenerated. It is all about eh buccal plate. If no buccal plate exists you must flap and regenerate independent of whether you are placing an implant or not.

Jorge Gutierrez - (11/29/2010 9:42 AM)

Dr Michael I would like to know in your video the membrane was exposed to the mouth that does not compromise the final result of their work, would not be better to cover with tissue graft?
What do you think of making an immediate implants with the technique without flap?

Related Videos
Bone Preservation at Extraction Site Premium Member Content

Bone Preservation at Extraction Site
This presentation will show the decision tree of how to merge different extraction sockets.

Presented By:: Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD;Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, PhD
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Innovative Technique for Ridge Augmentation Using SonicWeld RX Rigid Resorbable Barrier System - Part 4 of 5 Premium Member Content

Innovative Technique for Ridge Augmentation Using SonicWeld RX Rigid Resorbable Barrier System - Part 4 of 5
Dr. Gerhard Iglhaut describes the science as well as the step-by-step techniques for incorporating hard and soft tissue augmentation in everyday clinical practice focused on esthetic implant therapy.

Presented By:: Gerhard Michael Iglhaut, DDS
Presentation Style: Lecture
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Autologous Bone vs. Bioactive Modifiers/BMP-2: A Clinical Update in Bone Regeneration - Part 1 of 2
There are several techniques and materials available for implant site development. The choice may depend on a number of factors including size of the defect, osseous morphology, costs and surgeon or patient preferences. Autogenous bone has long been considered the gold standard of graft materials. The trend today is to reduce patient morbidity but still provide predictable outcomes. This lecture will discuss the use of autogenous bone versus using bioactive modifiers such as platelet concentrates, rhPDGF and rhBMP-2 as replacement for the need to harvest bone.

Presented By:: Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Managing the Extraction Site - Optimal Preservation and Enhancement Techniques Premium Member Content

Managing the Extraction Site - Optimal Preservation and Enhancement Techniques
The importance of piezosurgery, atraumatic surgical technique, the use of bone grafts, resorbable membranes and growth factors will be elucidated along with soft tissue enhancement.

Presented By:: Michael Sonick, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Tissue Engineering and Platelet Derived Growth Factors: Evidence Based Therapy Premium Member Content

Tissue Engineering and Platelet Derived Growth Factors: Evidence Based Therapy
Platelet derived growth factors are now routinely utilized in reconstructive therapy. This presentation describes very detailed and evidence based guidelines for clinicians interested in enhancing their abilities in tissue engineering, especially as it relates to bone augmentation.

Presented By:: Joseph Choukroun, MD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1
Watch Now>>
Tissue Engineering and Platelet Derived Growth Factors: Evidence Based Therapy Premium Member Content

Tissue Engineering and Platelet Derived Growth Factors: Evidence Based Therapy
Platelet derived growth factors are now routinely utilized in reconstructive therapy. This presentation describes very detailed and evidence based guidelines for clinicians interested in enhancing their abilities in tissue engineering, especially as it relates to bone augmentation. Specifically, while successful bone augmentation requires the standard surgical parameters of space maintenance, low pressure on the grafts and tension-free flap closure, optimization of this goal requires management and enhancement of the local biological conditions with growth factors. Towards that end, platelet concentrates through the constant release of growth factors are able to promote and enhance new vascularization, provide plasma protein, normal lipidemia, as well as increased collagen and fibrin activity.

Presented By:: Joseph Choukroun, MD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
A Novel Strategy for Bone Integration and Regeneration: Case Studies

A Novel Strategy for Bone Integration and Regeneration: Case Studies
Ultraviolet light treatment of dental implants immediately prior to placement, or photofunctionalization, is a novel clinical tool with the potential to improve implant therapy. Photofunctionalization improves the surface properties of titanium surfaces by removing hydrocarbons, regenerating hydrophilicity, and optimizing electrostatic properties. We photofunctionalizated dental implants and titanium mesh (Ti mesh) in two complex clinical cases requiring simultaneous guided bone regeneration, sinus elevation, immediate implant placement into the extraction socket, and esthetic consideration

Author(s): Akiyoshi Funato, D.D.S.;Ryohei Tonotsuka, DDS; Hitochi Murabe, DDS; Makoto Hirota, DDS, PhD; Takahiro Ogawa, DDS, PhD
View Article>>
Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement

Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement
One method to measure the success of dental implant treatment is to evaluate marginal peri-implant bone-level changes and stability over time. The location of the fixture–abutment interface (FAI) can be of major importance when the goal is to construct esthetic restorations. In these situations the FAI is often placed in a more apical position to create an ideal emergence profile for the prosthetic construction. However, several animal studies have reported that placement of the FAI in a subcrestal position may result in peri-implant marginal bone loss. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant for implants with reduced abutment diameters placed non-submerged and in subcrestal positions.

Author(s): Alan Fetner, DMD;Theofilos Koutouzis, DDS; Michael Fetner, DMD; Tord Lundgren, DDS
View Article>>
Buccal Plate Regeneration with Immediate Postextraction Implant Placement and Restoration: Case Reports

Buccal Plate Regeneration with Immediate Postextraction Implant Placement and Restoration: Case Reports
In these reports, buccal bone plate regeneration was obtained through a flapless approach and immediate postextraction implant placement with a cancellous bone and collagen graft in the buccal gap.

Author(s): Alberto Maria Albiero, MD; Renato Benato, MD, DMD; Marco Degidi, MD, DDS
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2019

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login ·