Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface

Description:
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development. A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented. Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.

Date Added:
6/29/2016

Author(s):

Ehab Moussa, DDS Ehab Moussa, DDS
Dr Ehab Moussa graduated with a bachelors degree of dental surgery (BDS) in 2009 from faculty of dentistry, Alexandria university, Egypt. He then completed a ...
[read more]




Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface




Questions & Comments
Ehab Moussa - (9/2/2016 8:21 PM)

Thank you dear Figen.

FİGEN ÖZÇELEBİ - (8/15/2016 10:21 AM)

One of the best presentations I have seen Dr Moussa thank you

Robin Tran - (7/12/2016 11:27 AM)

Dr Moussa,
thank you very much for your reply.
RT

Ehab Moussa - (7/11/2016 11:45 PM)

Snjezana, I am honored you enjoyed the presentation. I am sure with your outstanding skills, you will achieve great results with Ti mesh !! Best regards, Ehab

Ehab Moussa - (7/11/2016 11:43 PM)

Dear Dr Tran, Thank you for your kind comment. I have seen your post in the forum. Obviously having some clinical photographs would help more, however these are my thoughts. Patient 1: It appears as though the implant might not be deep enough. If you are set on keeping the implant in place, you can attempt submerging the implant with a rotated palatal pedicle and then uncovering after soft tissue has been augmented, don't think bone grafting will be much help here. Again, very difficult to tell without clinical photographs. If the entire implant surface is exposed 360 degrees all around through the gingiva, I would remove the implant and start all over. The fact that you are faced with a tissue deficiency and implant exposure (even if just on the buccal aspect), still compels me to remove the implant. Perhaps removal, followed by soft and hard tissue augmentation and implant placement would be most predictable for the long term. I would not recommend any bone augmentation if soft tissue quality is poor. Case 2: Perhaps bone augmentation with delayed implant placement would be a predictable plan. The sausage technique with a collagen membrane seems like a good alternative here. Non resorbable barriers and Ti-mesh would also work well, however do have a higher chance of complications and may not be needed (Again difficult to tell just from scans). Difficult to determine whether simultaneous implant placement is possible here, it appears as though the ridge has also a large buccal concavity. Personally I do not disturb the pseudoperiosteum layer. However I measure the thickness, and attempt to place my implants 1-2mm subcrestal to account for any future remodeling that may occur. Perhaps adding some clinical images and posting the case in the forum will allow you to also get extremely valuable input from the members. I do this quiet often, and it has SAVED me several times. I do hope that this helps, and I thank you for your kind interest. Best regards, Ehab

Robin Tran - (7/11/2016 3:55 AM)

Dr, you mentioned , upon removing titanium membrane, there was a layer of pseudoperiotium . should I scrape it off before placing implant. thanks RT

Robin Tran - (7/11/2016 3:26 AM)

Dr Moussa:Ifind this video very informative. I need your advice on 2 cases: 1st case. 29 yo male heavy smoker,healthy individual.he stopped smooking cold turkey when #8 was extracted and implant was placed. bone graft and membrane was placed right after. 1 week later, bone graft failed due to smoking again. I removed the graft, cleaned with saline and tetracycline powder, placed new graft again(using nonresorbable PTFE membrane without primary closure) and left implant in tag. Area healed, but buccal surface bone loss is significantly and about 1mm of implant is showed above gum. I have to go in and graft again. I wont be able to get primary closure even full flap is lifted up high due to small area of mucosa. I am using Hiossen. Should i: 1. use titanium membrane with PTFE nonresorbable membrane on the outside 2. leave the area with PTFE see through.
What kind and brand of titamium membrane are you using? what tools did you use to cut titanium membrane and to tag the screws in?
2. 2nd case: 50 yo male, smoker and healthy. He stopped smooking 2months before procedure. He had a bridge 9to 11. #11 had cavity and unrestorabe. I did removed #11 and grafted bone on #10 and #11 using nonresorbable memebrane PTFE without primary closure. #9 has temporary. My plan is to place implant on #11 later and canteliver #10 from #11 because spaces 10 and 11 is about 9mm only. this guy have issues: a. scar tissue(?) around 10 and 11 to the upper inside lip is hard and immobile.It's been like this for years. b. bone graft at alveolar crest is around 4 to 5mm at most. How can I overcome placing implant and graft more bone from here. I will find ways to post ctscans ad xrays. thank you. RT. Please look for my scans and xrays under implant dental forum Attn Dr Moussa. thank you

snjezana pohl - (7/10/2016 3:09 PM)

Thank you for very informative and didactically well structured presentation! Literature overview and results with Ti mesh are really encouraging,you convinced me to try it. Best regards Snjezana

Ehab Moussa - (7/8/2016 5:38 PM)

Dear Dr Mirna; Thank you for your kind comment. Really the key for adequate primary closure is RELEASE OF THE FLAPS. For the labial flap I use a sharp 15 or 15c blade for a periosteal scoring incision preferably apical to the MGJ. The incision does not have to be very deep, just has to be continuos from one end of the flap to the other. Following that, depending on the amount of release required, I can go back and deepen the incision with a blade. Releasing the lingual flap really simplifies the closure so much, and increases our chances of maintaining a closed healing environment (same technique as described in presentation). For the palatal flap, adequate reflection in both a mesio-distal and apico-coronal dimension is essential for double layer closure. As for the closure, I use deep horizontal mattress sutures about 4-5 mm from the flap margin on both labial and lingual flaps, this increases the area of CT contact between both flaps. Then a continuos interlocking or interrupted sutures to approximate the flap margins together. I hope this helps. Best regards, Ehab

Related Videos
Autogenous Bone Graft - Part 5: Case Review Premium Member Content

Autogenous Bone Graft - Part 5: Case Review
Detailed Case Review of a ridge augmentation case utilizing autogeneous bone harvested from the ramus buccal shelf.

Presented By:: Michael A Pikos, DDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Bone Reconstruction: A New Algorithm for the Implantologist

Bone Reconstruction: A New Algorithm for the Implantologist
Bone Reconstruction: A New Algorithm for the Implantologist

Presented By:: Craig M Misch, DDS, MDS
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Advanced Simultaneous Bone Ridge Augmentation and Internal Sinus Elevation - Part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Advanced Simultaneous Bone Ridge Augmentation and Internal Sinus Elevation - Part 1 of 2
This video centric and surgically based presentation will highlight a few of these new tools in the augmentation of a severely resorbed posterior maxillary ridge in conjunction with a progressive crestal approach for sinus augmentation.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface Premium Member Content

Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development. A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented. Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.

Presented By:: Ehab Moussa, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Optimum Implant Esthetics Through Extraction Socket Preservation Techniques Premium Member Content

Optimum Implant Esthetics Through Extraction Socket Preservation Techniques
This presentation will focus on ideal implant placement through maintaining the bucco-lingual dimension of bone following extraction through extraction socket preservation techniques.

Presented By:: Mario A. Vilardi, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Biologic Strategies to Enhance Clinical and Aesthetic Success in Oral Implantology Premium Member Content

Biologic Strategies to Enhance Clinical and Aesthetic Success in Oral Implantology
This webinar will discuss clinical strategies for treatment of the complex implant site involving bone grafting and implant placement. Our understanding of cellular pathways, and our ability to control the wound response, expands our capacity to effect better aesthetic outcomes and compress treatment time. The reduction of the inflammatory phase of tissue regeneration speeds up osseointegration, prevents crestal bone loss, maintains papillary form, increases the density of peri-implant bone and increases tissue biotype. This enhanced tissue response allows us to predictably treat even the most complex surgical cases, compress time to final reconstruction, and to maintain these favorable tissue outcomes over an extended period of time. The use of dental implants with advanced biologic features and the incorporation autologous growth factors will be demonstrated.

Presented By:: Robert J. Miller, DDS, FACD, DABOI
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Credit)
Watch Now>>
Managing Esthetic Implant Complications Premium Member Content

Managing Esthetic Implant Complications
Dental implant success today is judged not only by osseointegration but also by bone, tissue stability and of course long term esthetic results. Cosmetic predictability can often be difficult to attain, and esthetic implant failures can be multifactorial and patient management issues. Once esthetic implant failures occur, many cannot be fully corrected. Some complications must be addressed by an interdisciplinary dental team. In this summary of case reports, surgical considerations are provided, including cases of facial asymmetry/recession due to facial implant placement or bone loss resulting from technique/treatment failures, as well as papillary deficiencies. Restorative considerations for correcting failures are also discussed.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
Maximizing Aesthetics in the Deficient Alveolar Ridge

Maximizing Aesthetics in the Deficient Alveolar Ridge
This article will present a predictable method for replacing the lost bone prior to implant placement through the ramus block graft technique.

Author(s): Steven L. Rasner, DMD, MAGD
View Article>>
Multitier Technique for Bone Augmentation Using Intraoral Autogenous Bone Blocks

Multitier Technique for Bone Augmentation Using Intraoral Autogenous Bone Blocks
Brånemarket al1 originally described autologous bone grafts used with dental implants,and they are now a well-accepted procedure in oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Placement of an end osseous implant requires sufficient bone volume for complete bone coverage.Further-more,the patter no fridge resorption ,which contributes to a nun favorable maxillo mandibular relationship,requires angulation of the implant and/or angled abutment,and affects the proximity of adjacent facial concavities (maxillary sinus,nasal cavity)and vital structures(mandibular nerve).

Author(s): Devorah Schwartz-Arad, DMD, PhD;Liran Levin, DMD
View Article>>
Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts

Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts
Autogenous bone grafts have been used for many years for alveolar ridge augmentation and are still considered to be the gold standard for jaw reconstruction. The use of these grafts with osseointegrated implants was originally discussed by Brånemark et al., who used the iliac crest as the donor site. For repair of most localized alveolar defects, however, bone grafts from the mandible offer advantages over iliac crest grafts. These include the proximity of donor and recipient sites, convenient surgical access, decreased donor site morbidity and decreased cost. This article focuses on posterior maxillary and mandibular osseous augmentation in a staged approach for implant placement. Both horizontal and vertical deficiencies are addressed with the use of symphysis and ramus buccal shelf donor block bone via case presentations.

Author(s): Michael A Pikos, DDS
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2019

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login ·