Dental Education
Online Dental Education Dental education lectures and videos Online dental ce Dental education articles Expert dental educators Dental products education Dental Community
 
Video Details
Ridge Split Technique for Ideal Implant Position and Ideal Buccal Bone Thickness

Description:
We often deal with cases that have just too little bone width for the desired implant. One of the most simple and successful treatment modalities is the ridge split technique. This allows the expansion of the ridge with simultaneous placement of the implants in most cases and provides excellent bone on both the buccal and the palatal sides of the implant. This case goes through some of the important factors when doing a ridge split technique.

Date Added:
6/13/2014

Author(s):

Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD
Dr Gluckman completed his dental training at the university of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg in 1990. After spending a number of years in a general practice he complete...
[read more]






Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Ridge Split Technique for Ideal Implant Position and Ideal Buccal Bone Thickness




Questions & Comments
FİGEN ÖZÇELEBİ - (11/3/2015 6:12 AM)

is it necessary to use aggressive fluted implant with ridge splitting?

KATHY ABBOTT - (11/2/2015 10:36 AM)

If this technique is very difficult in a single tooth site, what would be your preferred method of augmentation on a 5mm wide ridge to accept an implant in the maxillary first bicuspid region? (Anticipate need to augment at least 3 mm).

robert d'orazio - (5/13/2015 8:21 PM)

i learned ridge splitting from dr. tatum 25 years ago without elevating a tissue flap beyond the implant diameter with wonderful long term results. your technique of maintaining the periosteum holds credence as well and is nice to see. i appreciate your emphasizing severing the trabeculae to depth and the patience required with ridge splitting. thanks much for sharing this with us.

ENRIQUE TREVINO - (8/4/2014 5:22 PM)

Great technique! I have been doing this technique since the late 80's, most of those implants still in function for many years, Thank You for sharing

Maurice Salama - (7/6/2014 10:24 AM)

Howard and Yiannis. I agree with both of you regarding immediate placement at the time of split. Honest replies and quite serious issues. Thanks for the honest discussion as it helps everyone. Dr. Salama

Howard Gluckman - (7/5/2014 6:40 AM)

Yiannis thank for your comments and questions. I agree with you totally. Ridge split requires a minimum of I believe 5mm of thick ness to be able to place implants at the same time. If you don't then you get resorbtion of the plate. I den if I split don't have a problem with stability even if I split deep as the shape of the ridge is critical it must be triangular shaped in other words it needs a wide base. By not splitting deeply I find that I get more fractures of the buccal plate. But your ideas are well thought out and the fact that you are trying different things to improve your results mean you are on the right track. Post some cases on XP lets see some of the work.

Howard Gluckman - (7/5/2014 6:29 AM)

HI Rick. Thanks for your questions and comments. The anlylos system is fantastic in that you can use a narrower implant compared to the Noble active. What I have found though is that the CX implant seems to have more fractures of the abutment in the posterior area and hence I have moved away from it in high load bearing areas. The company will tell you it doesn't happen but I am finding it more and more. I would strongly advise you use the standard B abutments in posterior areas and do an abutment level impression less fractures with these as they are solid.

yiannis vergoullis - (6/23/2014 9:14 AM)

Howard excellent skills and presentation as always, I have followed up my ERE cases and came to the conclusion that if the buccal expanded plate was less than 2mm thick then I had greater % of implants with facial dehiscence ranging 1-3mm at uncovery surgery. Thus, if this pre-requisite is not met I go two stages. b. in cases that I splitted the ridge deeper than 2/3 of implant body I had the incidence of implant movement during healing phase and the implant integrated in different than placement position.Thus now I split the less deep possible, or place longer implants. Your thoughts on these issues? Yiannis

richard french - (6/22/2014 11:21 PM)

howard
love your practical approach. notice you are using nobel active(?) in this case. I was using this system but changed to ankylos becauce I felt the implant/abutment connection was superior and a lot of the better work was using the ankylos system. Your opinion please.
regards rick

Related Videos
The Ridge Split Technique in the Edentulous Maxilla: Technique and Management of Complications Premium Member Content

The Ridge Split Technique in the Edentulous Maxilla: Technique and Management of Complications
The Ridge Split Technique in the Edentulous Maxilla: Technique and Management of Complications

Presented By:: Howard Gluckman, BDS, MChD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Advanced Simultaneous Bone Ridge Augmentation and Internal Sinus Elevation - Part 1 of 2 Premium Member Content

Advanced Simultaneous Bone Ridge Augmentation and Internal Sinus Elevation - Part 1 of 2
This video centric and surgically based presentation will highlight a few of these new tools in the augmentation of a severely resorbed posterior maxillary ridge in conjunction with a progressive crestal approach for sinus augmentation.

Presented By:: Maurice Salama, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Bio-Surgery; Tips for More Biological and Prosthodontic Approach Premium Member Content

Bio-Surgery; Tips for More Biological and Prosthodontic Approach
In oral rehabilitation, obtaining a good aesthetic outcome is no longer enough for our patients. It is imperative that these good results do prevail in time. The best way to achieve this goal, is to correctly diagnose each individual clinical case, and to choose Biological tools and Biological treatment techniques, that respect our own physiology and Nature. Through this lecture, the authors try to share a few Surgical and Prosthodontic Bio-tips in Implant Dentistry, that in a simple and predictable way, can lead us to a great long lasting aesthetic results.

Presented By:: Bernardo de Mira Corrêa, DDS, DMD;Filipe Lopes, DDS, DMD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Surgical Options and Solutions in Maxillary Ridge Augmentation: Advantages of Combined Therapy Premium Member Content

Surgical Options and Solutions in Maxillary Ridge Augmentation: Advantages of Combined Therapy
This surgical video presentation will demonstrate the treatment of two advanced cases of maxillary deficiency. The emphasis of this presentation will be on combining several state-of-the-art surgical augmentation therapies to optimize dimensional increases in the deficient ridges in the maxilla in preparation of implant therapy. The two cases presented, of severe and moderate bone defects, in the Anterior Maxilla, the bone were reconstructed by using the anatomy (sub-nasal elevation), and several surgical techniques (bone augmentation, soft tissue manipulation and implant placement) in a systematic team oriented protocol (Surgeon, Restorative Dentist and Lab) to get the best esthetic results.

Presented By:: Devorah Schwartz-Arad, DMD, PhD
Presentation Style: Video
Community Rating:
 
Watch Now>>
Related Courses
Is There One or More Reasons to Optimize the PRF & PRP Protocols? Future Trends in Dentistry, Orthopedics and Facial Aesthetics Premium Member Content

Is There One or More Reasons to Optimize the PRF & PRP Protocols? Future Trends in Dentistry, Orthopedics and Facial Aesthetics
The “Advanced” PRF (A-PRF) and “Injectable” PRF (I-PRF) protocols were designed with this new concept. Indications are numerous in all medical fields where we need regeneration: bone, cartilage, skin etc... However, the use of growth factors is not a guarantee of long term stability, as they are active only at the beginning of the process. Numerous rules of tissue engineering have to be applied to maintain the regenerated bone through an adequate blood supply: this lecture is an enlightenment on the biological and mechanical conditions for long term stability of the bone: “grafted bone” or “bone around implants”.

Presented By:: Joseph Choukroun, MD
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface Premium Member Content

Regenerative Procedures for Implant Site Optimization: Establishing the Perio-Implant Interface
Emerging concepts in implant dentistry have allowed bone preservation to become a reality, thus reducing the need for extensive augmentation procedures. Nevertheless, clinicians are still confronted with atrophic defects that require complex regenerative strategies for dental implant rehabilitation. This presentation will focus on some of the essential elements for a predictable regenerative protocol in implant site development. A discussion will include the use of defect topography as a guide in choosing a suitable augmentation technique. Several considerations that allow for tension free wound closure will be reviewed. Furthermore, an evidence based approach in graft material selection will be presented. Clinical cases will then be reviewed, to demonstrate how to integrate the presented principles into daily clinical practice.

Presented By:: Ehab Moussa, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit)
Watch Now>>
Ridge Expansion, GBR & Meshes: Decision Making in Clinical Practice Premium Member Content

Ridge Expansion, GBR & Meshes: Decision Making in Clinical Practice
A variety of bone augmentation procedures are currently available at use to the clinician. Techniques of variable complexity can essentially yield favorable results. The choice of technique to utilize however, is often based on defect site presentation and operator comfort level. This presentation will focus on the use of ridge expansion, guided bone regeneration (GBR), and titanium mesh. Merits and indications of each technique will be discussed, and clinical cases will be presented that showcase the decision making process involved in treatment planning.

Presented By:: Ehab Moussa, DDS
Presentation Style: Online Self-Study Course
CE Hours: 1 CEU (Continuing Eduication Credit)
Watch Now>>
Related Articles
Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts

Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts
Autogenous bone grafts have been used for many years for alveolar ridge augmentation and are still considered to be the gold standard for jaw reconstruction. The use of these grafts with osseointegrated implants was originally discussed by Brånemark et al., who used the iliac crest as the donor site. For repair of most localized alveolar defects, however, bone grafts from the mandible offer advantages over iliac crest grafts. These include the proximity of donor and recipient sites, convenient surgical access, decreased donor site morbidity and decreased cost. This article focuses on posterior maxillary and mandibular osseous augmentation in a staged approach for implant placement. Both horizontal and vertical deficiencies are addressed with the use of symphysis and ramus buccal shelf donor block bone via case presentations.

Author(s): Michael A Pikos, DDS
View Article>>
Multitier Technique for Bone Augmentation Using Intraoral Autogenous Bone Blocks

Multitier Technique for Bone Augmentation Using Intraoral Autogenous Bone Blocks
Brånemarket al1 originally described autologous bone grafts used with dental implants,and they are now a well-accepted procedure in oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Placement of an end osseous implant requires sufficient bone volume for complete bone coverage.Further-more,the patter no fridge resorption ,which contributes to a nun favorable maxillo mandibular relationship,requires angulation of the implant and/or angled abutment,and affects the proximity of adjacent facial concavities (maxillary sinus,nasal cavity)and vital structures(mandibular nerve).

Author(s): Devorah Schwartz-Arad, DMD, PhD;Liran Levin, DMD
View Article>>
Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement

Retrospective Evaluation of Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants With Reduced Abutment Diameter Placed Non-Submerged and at Subcrestal Positions: The Effect of Bone Grafting at Implant Placement
One method to measure the success of dental implant treatment is to evaluate marginal peri-implant bone-level changes and stability over time. The location of the fixture–abutment interface (FAI) can be of major importance when the goal is to construct esthetic restorations. In these situations the FAI is often placed in a more apical position to create an ideal emergence profile for the prosthetic construction. However, several animal studies have reported that placement of the FAI in a subcrestal position may result in peri-implant marginal bone loss. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of bone grafting of the defect between the bone crest and the coronal aspect of the implant for implants with reduced abutment diameters placed non-submerged and in subcrestal positions.

Author(s): Alan Fetner, DMD;Theofilos Koutouzis, DDS; Michael Fetner, DMD; Tord Lundgren, DDS
View Article>>
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©2019

Preferred Language: English Flag
Contact Us · Login ·