Video Details
|
Revisiting the Papilla in 2016 - Part 2 of 2
Description:
In dental esthetics the regeneration of a compromised papilla , remains the most complex aspect of any reconstructive endeavor. The original 5mm Rule was found to exist only for a papilla bordered by 2 teeth and was expanded into a classification of 6 Types dependent on alternative adjacent support.e. implants or pontics.
While different surgical techniques can restore most aspects of a ridge deficiency,as part of the soft tissue restorative frame, the regeneration of lost proximal papilla form is surgically limited to those papillae bordered on each side by a pontic The Classification of 6 types of papilla defects is based on the specifics of the restorative support on either side of the individual site,and can therefore be a tooth, implant or pontic, or combinations of the 3.
The resultant possible 6 combinations or classes of papilla have different mean "predictable achievable papilla height dimensions" which, range from 3 mm between 2 implants to more than double that between adjacent pontics, where it may exceed 6 mm.
Date Added:
1/27/2016
Author(s):
David Garber, DMD
Dr.
David Garber has a dual appointment at the Medical College
of Georgia School of Dentistry, in Augusta Georgia, as Clinic...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Soft Tissue / Revisiting the Papilla in 2016 - Part 2 of 2
Questions & Comments
|
Christine Wong - (2/16/2016 7:20 PM)
Thank you for an excellent presentation. I have a question about the last pink and white ceramic papilla. How do you get an accurate impression of the interproximal space?
|
Edison Louie - (2/14/2016 5:30 PM)
Excellent application of materials and current concepts to a variety of complex challenges. Thank you!
|
MICHAEL ERICSON TAN - (1/27/2016 10:12 PM)
absolutely amazing. thank you.
|
carlos cardenas - (1/27/2016 1:19 PM)
Excellent: why doesn't considering make one Le fort I modify partial in that case?
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Revisiting the Papilla in 2015 - Part 1 of 2
In dental esthetics the regeneration of a compromised papilla , remains the most complex aspect of any reconstructive endeavor. The original 5mm Rule was found to exist only for a papilla bordered by 2 teeth and was expanded into a classification of 6 Types dependent on alternative adjacent support.e. implants or pontics.
Presented By:: |
David Garber, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting Techniques
In this presentation, Prof. Giovanni Zucchelli develops a critical comparison between the different CTG harvesting techniques, and shows the correct management of this kind of graft as well as its use in coronally advanced flap surgical technique for the treatment of gingival recessions.
Presented By:: |
Prof. Giovanni Zucchelli, DDS, PhD |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Revisiting the Papilla in 2016 - Part 2 of 2
While different surgical techniques can restore most aspects of a ridge deficiency,as part of the soft tissue restorative frame, the regeneration of lost proximal papilla form is surgically limited to those papillae bordered on each side by a pontic The Classification of 6 types of papilla defects is based on the specifics of the restorative support on either side of the individual site,and can therefore be a tooth, implant or pontic, or combinations of the 3.
Presented By:: |
David Garber, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Acellular Dermal Grafts in the Correction of Gingival Recession: Discovering the Possibilities
Autogenous connective tissue grafts from the palate have been the gold standard for surgically correcting gingival recession for decades. With the advent of newer soft (and hard) tissue allografts, grafting procedures are increasingly predictable, quick, effective, and less painful for patients. In this presentation, follow the evolution of root coverage surgery from autogenous grafts to the more contemporary alternatives of today. Discover how these newer materials are making it easier for patients to say "yes" and how their results can impact the level of esthetics, periodontal health and predictable restorative dentistry our profession can deliver.
Presented By:: |
David Wong, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modern Day Challenges with Implants in the Esthetic Zone
This presentation will address treatment planning strategies with multiple tooth sites incorporating teeth, immediate implants with tooth replacement, and pontics in the esthetic zone. Innovations in implant macro design, to achieve more consistent screw-retained definitive restorations, and devices / strategies in provisional restoration fabrication to save time will be presented.
Presented By:: |
Stephen J. Chu, DMD, MSD, CDT |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 Continuing Education Unit (CEU) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Mucosal Coronally Positioned Flap for the Management of Excessive Gingival Display in the Presence of Hypermobility of the Upper Lip and Vertical Maxillary Excess: A Case Report
Excessive gingival display is a frequent
finding that can occur because of various
intraoral or extraoral etiologies. This report describes
the use of a mucosal coronally positioned flap for the
management of a gummy smile associated with vertical
maxillary excess and hypermobility of the upper
lip. For patients desiring a less invasive
alternative to orthognathic surgery, the mucosal coronally
positioned flap is a viable alternative. We demonstrate
short-term successful use of this technique
for the management of excessive gingival display in
the presence of slight vertical maxillary excess and
hypermobility of the upper lip. Long-term follow-up
studies are needed to determine stability of the results.
Author(s): |
Monish Bhola, DDS, MSD;Nomahn Humayun; Shilpa Kolhatkar; Jason Souiyas |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
Buccal Sliding Palatal Pedicle Flap Technique for Wound Closure After Ridge Augmentation
One standard approach for wound closure after ridge augmentation is coronal flap advancement. Coronal flap advancement results in displacement of the mucogingival junction and reduction of the vestibulum. In the maxilla, a buccal sliding palatal flap can be applied for primary wound closure after ridge augmentation. The dissected part of the palatal connective tissue is left exposed, thus eliminating or reducing the amount of the coronal flap advancement respectively and increasing the amount of keratinized gingiva. In combination with guided soft tissue augmentation, this flap design enables a three-dimensional peri-implant soft tissue augmentation.
Author(s): |
Snježana Pohl, MD, DMD;Maurice Salama, DMD;Pantelis Petrakakis, DDS, DPH |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
Soft Tissue Enhancement After Implant Placement
Soft tissue management is one of the key factors for successful implant restoration. Esthetics can be strongly influenced by the conditions of the peri-implant tissue. Substantial knowledge of tissue anatomy and biology is a fundamental prerequisite for surgical success. The present chapter introduces different techniques to improve the appearance of the soft tissue after implant placement. Cases of repositioned flaps, FGGs, and CTGs are presented along with biological considerations. It was our intention to present various indications and options to the clinician to achieve an increased amount of peri-implant KG or connective tissue thickness.
Author(s): |
Christian F.J. Stappert, DDS, MS, PhD, Priv-Doz;Davide Romeo, DDS, PhD |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|