Video Details
|
Ridge Splitting and/or GBR - Maxilla vs. Mandible - Part 1 of 2
Description:
Mandibular ridge splitting has been a clinical challenge due to high density of cortical bone. Therefore, some clinicians recommends two stage approach to overcome this issue. We will also present an unique ridge splitting technique that is easy to do and predictable using one stage approach.
Date Added:
7/9/2012
Author(s):
Samuel Lee, DDS
Dr. Samuel Lee has earned double doctoral degree in Dentistry. He has earned Doctor of Medical Science (4-5 years full time doctoral degree) from Harvard Univ...
[read more]
|

|
Online Videos / Surgery / Bone Grafting / Ridge Splitting and/or GBR - Maxilla vs. Mandible - Part 1 of 2
Questions & Comments
|
John Carpenter - (9/2/2012 6:25 PM)
Excellent video! I have always split the maxilla and spread with osteotomes. This video removed a few barriers I had to splitting the mandible.
|
Andres Paraud - (8/10/2012 2:29 PM)
Dear dr Lee where its the continue of this great lecture? regards Andres Paraud
|
omid moghaddas - (7/29/2012 12:39 AM)
Tnx.Dear Dr Lee ,is it more predictable to do ridge splitting in mandible when we have broad base comparing to have parallel walls from crestal area to the apical?when you do the horizontal osteotomy ,the depth of should be similar to the height of the implant or more than that?will you do ridge splitting in posterior mandible with parallel walls and 3mm thickness or you prefer to do GBR or block grafts in these cases to reduce the risk of fracture?thanks again .
|
samuel lee - (7/28/2012 9:41 PM)
Dear Dr. Omid,
thanks for watching the video! You are right that maxilla is more spongious and easier to split. But, due to concavity of apical region on pre maxilla, the angulation of implant becomes too buccal. Therefore, I recommend GBR on pre maxilla over ridge splitting. However, mandibular ridge is lingually inclined by 20 degree, so implant angulation is more favorable after ridge split. Thanks
|
omid moghaddas - (7/25/2012 2:40 PM)
i am agree in some part that ridge splitting is more predictable in mandible,but on the other hand ,there is more sponinuous bone available in maxilla so it can be more easily condensed with less risk of facture during spltting.please tell me if this belif is right.thanks so much for this perfect and comprehensive presentation Dr Lee
|
seyed ali mosalla nezhad - (7/23/2012 9:53 AM)
excellent video
|
Paul Scholl - (7/14/2012 6:40 PM)
Nice presentation with new technology.
|
Ronni Deniger - (7/11/2012 3:59 PM)
Excellent Video, Thanks!
|
Related Videos |
|
|
Ridge Splitting and/or GBR - Maxilla vs. Mandible - Part 2 of 2
Mandibular ridge splitting has been a clinical challenge due to high density of cortical bone. Therefore, some clinicians recommends two stage approach to overcome this issue. We will also present a unique ridge splitting technique that is easy to do and predictable using one stage approach.
Presented By:: |
Samuel Lee, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interpositional Bone Grafts to Treat the Posterior Atrophic Mandible
This presentation analyzes the interpositional bone graft or inlay technique, discussing the reconstructive surgical approach. Horizontal osteotomy with the interposition of bone in the form of a “sandwich” involves raising a coronal osteotomized segment of the mandible, which is still attached to the lingual periosteum, and interpositioning a block bone graft. This technique guarantees a dual vascular supply to the inlay graft from the lingual periosteum and from the residual bone; it also allows optimum use of the native basal bone, which should be less prone to resorption. The advantages and disadvantages of the inlay technique are compared with other commonly used augmentation techniques in the management of posterior mandibular atrophies.
Presented By:: |
Pietro Felice, MD, PhD, DDS |
Presentation Style: |
Video |
Community Rating: |
|
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Related Courses |
|
|
Integrating Orthodontics with Orthognatic Surgery; From Virtual Planning to Clinical Excellence
Dentofacial deformities in adults require the combination and skills of the orthodontist and maxillofacial surgeon. In order to achieve all the functional and esthetic goals. In digital dentistry’s days virtual planning of orthodontics and orthognatic surgical corrections has become a valuable tool. Results can be compared to planning both for reevaluation and sharing information with colleagues and our patients. Virtual planning account for more reliable and precise results in our orthognatic surgery. Orthodontic preparation is the gold standard for maximizing the surgical correction. Cases will illustrate our treatment protocol from A to Z for these complex and challenging situations.
Presented By:: |
Miguel Hirschhaut, DDS;Nelson Leon, DDS, OMFS |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Creative Next Generation Surgical Tools and Solutions for the Implant Practice
Modern Bone Grafting has become more predictable than ever before. Recent developments in CBCT 3D Diagnosis and the utilization of bioactive modifiers such as PRGF, PRF and BMP-2 have stimulated further advances in surgical techniques as well as a New Age Surgical Armamentarium to maximize the efficiencies and success of these sophisticated procedures.
Presented By:: |
Maurice Salama, DMD |
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
|
Alveolar Ridge Regenerative Strategies: Autogenous Bone vs BMP-2
This clinical based presentation will compare the use of autogenous bone vs BMP-2 for alveolar ridge reconstruction. The science, indications, advantages and disadvantages of each approach will be featured. Single tooth to full arch reconstruction cases will also be shown along with understanding the application of non-resorbable vs resorbable mesh barriers for alveolar ridge reconstruction.
Presented By:: |
|
Presentation Style: |
Online Self-Study Course |
CE Hours: |
1 CEU (Continuing Education Unit) |
|
Watch Now>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
Alloplastic Bone Substitutes Around Dental Implants
The repair of osseous defects has been a goal in dentistry for many decades. Subsequently, within the last several years, there has been an emergence of a new class of materials in dentistry referred to as synthetic bone. Finding the ideal bone substitute material has been the goal of researchers for many years. In attempting to achieve this ideal material, dental practitioners have tried with varying degrees of success: autogenous and demineralized freeze-dried bone, allografts of plastic, carbon…
Author(s): |
Lee H. Silverstein, DDS, MS, FACD, FICD;Lee M. Whitesides, DMD, MMSC |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
Modified IVAN Technique: Long-Term Follow-Up of 20 Cases Over 2 to 11 Years
When natural teeth fail, frequently there is a loss of hard and soft tissue. This may complicate subsequent dental implant placement by
creating insufficient bone to house the implant. This also occurs when the tooth has been missing for an extended period, especially in the
premaxilla, where the bone is less dense and often lacks sufficient volume of facial bone. Site reconstruction to accommodate implant
placement often requires both hard and soft tissue augmentation. The modified interpositional vascularized augmentation neogenesis
(mIVAN) technique achieves the desired treatment goals in both delayed and immediate placement scenarios. The technique will be
discussed as well as the long-term follow-up on 20 cases.
Author(s): |
Snježana Pohl, MD, DMD;Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|
The Bio-Derm Ridge Plumping Technique for Pontic Site Development
Seibert Class III apicocoronal and buccolingual alveolar ridge defects with associated gingival mucosal atrophy and absence of interdental papillae are common in edentulous areas within the anterior esthetic zone of the maxilla. Normal emergence profiles, critical to achieving
esthetic restorations, require restoration of
normal hard and soft tissue morphology, including
re-establishment of adjacent interdental papillae.
Author(s): |
Nicholas Toscano, DDS, MS;Dan Holtzclaw, DDS, MS |
|
View Article>>
|
|
|
|
|